A8-7410 vs Core i5-13400F

CPU

GPU

A8-7410

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

A8-7410 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

A8-7410

4 / 4

2,741

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+813.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7410 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7410 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7410

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,460 vs 11,408).
❌Older platform position on FP4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +235.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and older memory support.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-7410.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while A8-7410 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than A8-7410?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 235.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 229.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 813.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 235.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 229.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 235.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP4, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A8-7410 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7410

The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 59.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-7410 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7410 scores 2,741 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 160.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,356 vs 2,407, a 55.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,460 vs 11,408 (106.9% advantage for the Core i5-13400F).

Feature	A8-7410	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+84%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	—	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	2,741	25,029+813%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	1,356	2,407+78%
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,460	11,408+230%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the A8-7410 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-7410) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (A8-7410) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Carrizo-L SoC (A8-7410) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	A8-7410	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FP4	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	192 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-7410) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.