A8-7650K vs Core i3-6167U

A8-7650K vs Core i3-6167U Performance Spectrum

A8-7650K

4 / 4

3,114

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6167U

2 / 4

3,128

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7650K vs Core i3-6167U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7650K vs Core i3-6167U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7650K

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Core i3-6167U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-6167U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,114 vs 3,128).
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7650K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7650K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7650K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6167U better than A8-7650K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7650K is ahead with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6167U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-6167U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6167U is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A8-7650K vs Core i3-6167U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7650K

The A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,114 points. Launch price was $152.

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7650K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6167U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7650K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7650K versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U — a 33.8% clock advantage for the A8-7650K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A8-7650K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-6167U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7650K scores 3,114 against the Core i3-6167U's 3,128 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-6167U.

Feature	A8-7650K	Core i3-6167U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+22%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,114	3,128

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7650K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6167U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7650K	Core i3-6167U
Socket	FM2+	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7650K) / not specified (Core i3-6167U). The A8-7650K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Core i3-6167U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7650K rivals Core i3-4170.