A8-7650K vs Core i5-6198DU

A8-7650K vs Core i5-6198DU Performance Spectrum

A8-7650K

4 / 4

3,114

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-6198DU

2 / 4

3,109

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7650K vs Core i5-6198DU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7650K vs Core i5-6198DU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7650K

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-6198DU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-6198DU

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7650K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,109 vs 3,114).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7650K.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7650K better than Core i5-6198DU?

Yes. A8-7650K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7650K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7650K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7650K still makes the most sense overall. A8-7650K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7650K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7650K vs Core i5-6198DU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7650K

The A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,114 points. Launch price was $152.

Core i5-6198DU

The Core i5-6198DU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7650K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6198DU offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7650K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7650K versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6198DU — a 30.3% clock advantage for the A8-7650K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A8-7650K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-6198DU uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7650K scores 3,114 against the Core i5-6198DU's 3,109 — a 0.2% lead for the A8-7650K.

Feature	A8-7650K	Core i5-6198DU
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+43%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,114	3,109
Geekbench 6 Single	—	946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7650K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6198DU uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 2133 memory speed. The A8-7650K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-7650K) vs 12 (Core i5-6198DU) — the A8-7650K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7650K) and Integrated (Core i5-6198DU).

Feature	A8-7650K	Core i5-6198DU
Socket	FM2+	BGA
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-7650K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A8-7650K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6198DU). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7650K) and HD Graphics 510 (Core i5-6198DU) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6198DU targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-7650K rivals Core i3-4170; Core i5-6198DU rivals A9-9410.

Feature	A8-7650K	Core i5-6198DU
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R7 Graphics	HD Graphics 510
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Entry Level Laptop