Arc 7-Core iGPU vs Radeon R9 Fury Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc 7-Core iGPU vs Radeon R9 Fury FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc 7-Core iGPU vs Radeon R9 Fury: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 Fury is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc 7-Core iGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌175.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 47.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc 7-Core iGPU vs Radeon R9 Fury Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
The Arc 7-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,349 points.

Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 7-Core iGPU scores 9,349 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 7-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,349 | 9,521+2% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 3584+51100% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+120% | 1000 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+48% | 0.88 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 7-Core iGPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 Fury gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc 7-Core iGPU and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury.
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 4096-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,MPEG-2 (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 7-Core iGPU draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Arc 7-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 65°C-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 623.3+1701% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc 7-Core iGPU came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. On MSRP, Arc 7-Core iGPU was 63.8% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.0 (Arc 7-Core iGPU) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Arc 7-Core iGPU offers 171.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc 7-Core iGPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc 7-Core iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-64% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.0+172% | 17.3 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Fiji |
| Release | December 14 2023 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #375 | #274 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















