Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2800+
1 / 1
420
+3.7%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
1 / 1
405
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $178 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).
    • ❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 2800+ better than Mobile Athlon 64 2700+?
    Yes. Athlon 64 2800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 2800+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 12.5% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 2800+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 2800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $178 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.7% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 64 2800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 2800+

    The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 2800+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+'s 405 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 2800+.

    FeatureAthlon 64 2800+Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+12%
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    —
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512K
    Process
    130 nm
    —
    Architecture
    NewCastle (2004)
    Clawhammer (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    420+4%
    405
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ supports -200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2800+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+).

    FeatureAthlon 64 2800+Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
    Socket
    754
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-400
    400
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB+100%
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 2800+) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.

    FeatureAthlon 64 2800+Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    —
    None
    Unlocked
    —
    No
    AVX-512
    —
    No
    Virtualization
    —
    false