Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 715

1 / 1

405

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $178 MSRP, while Pentium M 715 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌323.8% higher power demand at 89W vs 21W.

Pentium M 715

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 89W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 2800+ better than Pentium M 715?

Yes. Athlon 64 2800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 2800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 2800+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 2800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $178 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 2800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2800+

The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

Pentium M 715

The Pentium M 715 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M 715 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 715 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 715 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Pentium M 715's 405 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 2800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2800+	Pentium M 715
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+20%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	420+4%	405

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 715 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 715 — the Pentium M 715 supports -233.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2800+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+) and Socket 479 (Pentium M 715).