Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3300+
Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 3300+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 3300+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3200+
2001Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 522).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.6 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Athlon 64 3300+
2004Why buy it
- ✅Costs $217 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3300+ better than Athlon 64 3200+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 3300+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3200+
The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.
Athlon 64 3300+
The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 3300+ uses NewCastle (2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Athlon 64 3300+'s 522 — a 3.3% lead for the Athlon 64 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Athlon 64 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | NewCastle (2004) |
| PassMark | 505 | 522+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 150 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR1-400 memory speed. The Athlon 64 3200+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 3 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3200+) vs 1 (Athlon 64 3300+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 3200+) vs 0 (Athlon 64 3300+) — the Athlon 64 3200+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket 939,Socket 754 (Athlon 64 3200+) and VIA K8T800,nForce3 (Athlon 64 3300+).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Athlon 64 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Athlon 64 3200+) vs None (Athlon 64 3300+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Athlon 64 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | None |
| Target Use | — | Retro Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 3200+ was priced at $417, while the Athlon 64 3300+ came in at $200. On launch pricing ($417 vs $200), Athlon 64 3300+ was $217 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3200+ delivers 1.2 pts/$ vs 2.6 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 3300+ — making the Athlon 64 3300+ the 73.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Athlon 64 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $417 | $200-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 2.6+117% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2004 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 3300+
