Athlon 64 3200+ vs Turion 64 ML-34
Athlon 64 3200+
Turion 64 ML-34
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1118 and the Turion 64 ML-34 is on rank 938, so the Turion 64 ML-34 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-34
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34
Athlon 64 3200+
The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.
Turion 64 ML-34
The Turion 64 ML-34 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-34 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3200+. The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-34 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Turion 64 ML-34's 515 — a 2% lead for the Turion 64 ML-34. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 505 | 515+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR-400 on the Turion 64 ML-34 — the Athlon 64 3200+ supports -201% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3200+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3200+) vs 1 (Turion 64 ML-34). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Athlon 64 3200+) vs AMD-V (Turion 64 ML-34). Primary use case: Turion 64 ML-34 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34
