Athlon 64 3200+
VS
Pentium M 750

Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 750

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1118 and the Pentium M 750 is on rank 131, so the Pentium M 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
257616%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
243421%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
176744%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
53245%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
42176%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36896%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21132%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20856%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18990%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18988%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18776%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18269%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18014%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17941%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17779%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
100%
#1119
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
97%
#1120
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
97%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
96%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
93%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
91%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
85%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
83%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
81%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
79%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
75%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
75%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
74%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
73%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 750

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
95%
#119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
302%
#120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
298%
#121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
274%
#122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
272%
#123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
270%
#125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
261%
#126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
250%
#127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
249%
#128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
243%
#131
Pentium M 750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 3200+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 750 in both compute-intensive tasks (4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3200+ and Pentium M 750

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3200+ and Pentium M 750 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3200+. The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 4% lead for the Athlon 64 3200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz+8%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
2 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
505+4%
485
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Pentium M 750).

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false