Athlon 64 3200+
VS
Xeon 3.06

Athlon 64 3200+ vs Xeon 3.06

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Xeon 3.06

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1118 and the Xeon 3.06 is on rank 1015, so the Xeon 3.06 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
257616%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
243421%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
176744%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
53245%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
42176%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36896%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21132%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20856%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18990%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18988%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18776%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18269%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18014%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17941%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17779%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
100%
#1119
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
97%
#1120
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
97%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
96%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
93%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
91%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
85%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
83%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
81%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
79%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
75%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
75%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
74%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
73%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.06

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
77546%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
14641%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
13008%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
10049%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
93%
#1015
Xeon 3.06
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
89%
#1019
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1020
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
83%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
75%
#1023
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
69%
#1024
Xeon E5-2640 v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $530
69%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
57%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
51%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
50%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
49%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
46%
#1030
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
25%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 3.06 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightAthlon 64 3200+Xeon 3.06
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3200+ ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightAthlon 64 3200+Xeon 3.06
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon 3.06

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Xeon 3.06

The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 — a 42.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 — a 5.8% lead for the Xeon 3.06. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3200+ vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Xeon 3.06
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.07 GHz+53%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Gallatin (2003−2004)
PassMark
505
535+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Xeon 3.06
Socket
754
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Xeon 3.06).

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+Xeon 3.06
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false