Athlon 64 3200+
VS
E1 Micro-6200T

Athlon 64 3200+ vs E1 Micro-6200T

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
VS
AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1118 and the E1 Micro-6200T is on rank 1091, so the E1 Micro-6200T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
257616%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
243421%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
176744%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
53245%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
42176%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36896%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21132%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20856%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18990%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18988%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18776%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18269%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18014%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17941%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17779%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
100%
#1119
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
97%
#1120
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
97%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
96%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
93%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
91%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
85%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
83%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
81%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
79%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
75%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
75%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
74%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
73%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 3200+E1 Micro-6200T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3200+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 3200+E1 Micro-6200T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3200+ and E1 Micro-6200T

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3200+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1 Micro-6200T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3200+. The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses Mullins (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the E1 Micro-6200T's 475 — a 6.1% lead for the Athlon 64 3200+.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+E1 Micro-6200T
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz+43%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
1024 kB+100%
Process
130 nm
28 nm-78%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Mullins (2014)
PassMark
505+6%
475
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+E1 Micro-6200T
Socket
754
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (E1 Micro-6200T).

FeatureAthlon 64 3200+E1 Micro-6200T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false