Athlon 64 3800+
Opteron 250
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Opteron 250 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Opteron 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Opteron 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3800+
2004Why buy it
- ✅+4.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $354 MSRP, while Opteron 250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 250
2004Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (620 vs 648).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3800+ better than Opteron 250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Opteron 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3800+
The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.
Opteron 250
The Opteron 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3800+ and Opteron 250 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 250 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the Venice (2004−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 250 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3800+ scores 648 against the Opteron 250's 620 — a 4.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Venice (2004−2005) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 648+5% | 620 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 250 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3800+ and Opteron 250
