Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium D 915
Athlon 64 FX-57
Pentium D 915
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-57 is positioned at rank 1137 and the Pentium D 915 is on rank 1002, so the Pentium D 915 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-57
Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 915
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Pentium D 915 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Pentium D 915 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1858%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium D 915
Athlon 64 FX-57
The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.
Pentium D 915
The Pentium D 915 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $74.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-57 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium D 915 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium D 915 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 915 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium D 915 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Pentium D 915's 705 — a 2.1% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-57. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Pentium D 915 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 720+2% | 705 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium D 915 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Pentium D 915 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 FX-57 launched at $1031 MSRP, while the Pentium D 915 debuted at $74. At current prices ($200 vs $10), the Pentium D 915 is $190 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-57 delivers 3.6 pts/$ vs 70.5 pts/$ for the Pentium D 915 — making the Pentium D 915 the 180.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Pentium D 915 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1031 | $74-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $10-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 70.5+1858% |
| Release Date | 2005 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium D 915
