Athlon 64 TF-20
VS
A4-5300B

Athlon 64 TF-20 vs A4-5300B

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A4-5300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 TF-20 is positioned at rank 790 and the A4-5300B is on rank 781, so the A4-5300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 TF-20

#778
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1178%
#779
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1161%
#780
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1066%
#781
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1061%
#782
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1051%
#784
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1015%
#785
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
973%
#786
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
972%
#787
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
946%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
99%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#800
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
97%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15008%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14181%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10297%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3102%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2457%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2149%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1231%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1215%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1106%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1106%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1094%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1049%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1045%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1036%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#781
A4-5300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#782
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
100%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
99%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
99%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
99%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-5300B delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 64 TF-20 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 TF-20A4-5300B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sherman (2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 TF-20A4-5300B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 TF-20 and A4-5300B

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

The Athlon 64 TF-20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Sherman (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,245 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A4-5300B

The A4-5300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,246 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 TF-20 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A4-5300B offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5300B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 TF-20 versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300B — a 76.9% clock advantage for the A4-5300B. The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the Sherman (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the A4-5300B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 TF-20 scores 1,245 against the A4-5300B's 1,246 — a 0.1% lead for the A4-5300B.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20A4-5300B
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+125%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Sherman (2009)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,245
1,246
Geekbench 6 Single
428
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 TF-20 uses the S1g1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-5300B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 TF-20 versus DDR3-1600 on the A4-5300B — the A4-5300B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-5300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon 64 TF-20) and A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300B).

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20A4-5300B
Socket
S1g1
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
32 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Athlon 64 TF-20) vs AMD-V (A4-5300B). The A4-5300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Athlon 64 TF-20 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5300B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureAthlon 64 TF-20A4-5300B
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop