Athlon 64 X2 5600+
E1-1200
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs E1-1200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs E1-1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs E1-1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,665 vs 1,682).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $505 MSRP, while E1-1200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌394.4% higher power demand at 89W vs 18W.
E1-1200
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 89W, a 71W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is E1-1200 better than Athlon 64 X2 5600+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs E1-1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $149.
E1-1200
The E1-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,682 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and E1-1200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-1200 — a 69.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5600+. The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the E1-1200 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ scores 1,665 against the E1-1200's 1,682 — a 1% lead for the E1-1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | E1-1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+107% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 90 nm | 40 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,665 | 1,682+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-1200 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | E1-1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and E1-1200
