
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Ryzen 7 3700X
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (775 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1209.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 427.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌448.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon 64 X2 TK-42?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 93.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 scores 775 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 186.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+175% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Tyler (2007−2009) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 775 | 22,430+2794% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 379.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 TK-42) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD S1 (Athlon 64 X2 TK-42) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-3200+380% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was priced at $60, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($60 vs $329), Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was $269 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 136.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-82% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 68.2+429% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














