
Athlon II X2 270

Core i5-10400F
Athlon II X2 270 vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 270 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 270 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 270
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $88 less on MSRP ($72 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (686 vs 5,783).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($72 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +435.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 339.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $72 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β122.2% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$72 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Athlon II X2 270?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 270 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 270
The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 270 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β a 23.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon II X2 270 uses the Regor (2009β2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270 scores 1,333 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β a 162.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 392 vs 1,454, a 115.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 686 vs 5,783 (157.6% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009β2013) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 1,333 | 13,029+877% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 392 | 1,454+271% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 686 | 5,783+743% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 270 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 270 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β the Core i5-10400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 270) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) β the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 270) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 270) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 270 was priced at $72, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($72 vs $160), Athlon II X2 270 was $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270 delivers 18.5 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F β making the Core i5-10400F the 125.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $72-55% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.5 | 81.4+340% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















