
Athlon II X4 600e

Ryzen 7 3700X
Athlon II X4 600e vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 600e vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
Athlon II X4 600e vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 600e
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,795 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +471.6% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 279.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌229% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 600e.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon II X4 600e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 600e vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 600e
The Athlon II X4 600e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $130.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 600e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X4 600e versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon II X4 600e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 600e scores 1,795 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 170.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 600e vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,795 | 22,430+1150% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 600e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 600e versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 600e) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 600e) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 600e) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 600e was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($100 vs $329), Athlon II X4 600e was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 600e delivers 17.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 116.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 68.2+281% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














