
Athlon II X4 620

Core i3-4330TE
Athlon II X4 620 vs Core i3-4330TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 620 vs Core i3-4330TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 620 vs Core i3-4330TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 620
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-4330TE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Athlon II X4 620 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,026).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 620 better than Core i3-4330TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 620 vs Core i3-4330TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620
The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.

Core i3-4330TE
The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4330TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE — a 8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 620 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-4330TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620 scores 2,026 against the Core i3-4330TE's 2,022 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 620. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330TE.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i3-4330TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+8% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+8% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,026 | 2,022 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 620 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4330TE uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE — the Core i3-4330TE supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X4 620) vs 16 (Core i3-4330TE) — the Core i3-4330TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97,C226 (Core i3-4330TE).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i3-4330TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 620) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Athlon II X4 620 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i3-4330TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 620 was priced at $99, while the Core i3-4330TE came in at $138. On launch pricing ($99 vs $138), Athlon II X4 620 was $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4330TE — making the Athlon II X4 620 the 33.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i3-4330TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-28% | $138 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+39% | 14.7 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















