Athlon II X4 620 vs Xeon E5410

AMD

Athlon II X4 620

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5410

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 620 vs Xeon E5410 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Xeon E5410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Xeon E5410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 620

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $157 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
  • Delivers 157.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,026 vs 2,032).
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Xeon E5410

2007

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 620 better than Xeon E5410?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5410 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon II X4 620 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon II X4 620 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 620 comes in $157 cheaper on MSRP at $99 MSRP versus $256 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5410 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 157.8% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Xeon E5410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 620

The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.

Intel

Xeon E5410

The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon E5410 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 — a 154.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 620 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620 scores 2,026 against the Xeon E5410's 2,032 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5410. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620Xeon E5410
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+688%
0.33 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+12%
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
6 MB (total)+1100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,026
2,032
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 620 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5410 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5410 — the Athlon II X4 620 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620Xeon E5410
Socket
AM3
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 620) / VT-x (Xeon E5410). Primary use case: Xeon E5410 targets Server.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620Xeon E5410
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 620 was priced at $99, while the Xeon E5410 came in at $256. On launch pricing ($99 vs $256), Athlon II X4 620 was $157 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5410 — making the Athlon II X4 620 the 88.2% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620Xeon E5410
MSRP
$99-61%
$256
Performance per Dollar
20.5+159%
7.9
Release Date
2009
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.