Athlon II X4 620 vs Phenom II X4 810

Athlon II X4 620 vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 620

4 / 4

2,026

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Phenom II X4 810

4 / 4

2,036

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 620

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,026 vs 2,036).

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($175 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 810 better than Athlon II X4 620?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 620 is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 810 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Phenom II X4 810 comes in 76.8% more expensive on MSRP at $175 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Athlon II X4 620 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 75.9% better value on paper (20.5 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 810 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 620 vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620

The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 620 and Phenom II X4 810 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620 scores 2,026 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X4 810. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810.

Feature	Athlon II X4 620	Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,026	2,036

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Athlon II X4 620	Phenom II X4 810
Socket	AM3	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 620 was priced at $99, while the Phenom II X4 810 came in at $175. On launch pricing ($99 vs $175), Athlon II X4 620 was $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 810 — making the Athlon II X4 620 the 55% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X4 620	Phenom II X4 810
MSRP	$99-43%	$175
Performance per Dollar	20.5+77%	11.6
Release Date	2009	2009

Search Athlon II X4 620 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.