
Athlon II X4 620
Popular choices:

Core i5-3317U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon II X4 620
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i5-3317U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3317U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-3317U
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Athlon II X4 620 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 620 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,014 vs 2,026).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Athlon II X4 620
2009Core i5-3317U
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Athlon II X4 620 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i5-3317U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3317U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 620 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,014 vs 2,026).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 620 better than Core i5-3317U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 620 and Core i5-3317U

Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 620
The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.

Core i5-3317U
Core i5-3317U
The Core i5-3317U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,014 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3317U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-3317U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3317U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620 scores 2,026 against the Core i5-3317U's 2,014 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 620. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3317U.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+53% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,026 | 2,014 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 620 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3317U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3317U — the Core i5-3317U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X4 620) vs 16 (Core i5-3317U) — the Core i5-3317U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3317U).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1600+53233% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+104857500% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 620) / true (Core i5-3317U). The Core i5-3317U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon II X4 620 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3317U rivals AMD A8-4555M.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620 | Core i5-3317U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













