Athlon II X4 635 vs Core i5-10400F
Athlon II X4 635
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon II X4 635 is positioned at rank #1069 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 635
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1321%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 635 and Core i5-10400F
Athlon II X4 635
The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 635 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon II X4 635 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 635 scores 2,248 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 141.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 658 vs 8,191 (170.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 1,454, a 155.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 5,783 (165.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz+48% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,248 | 13,029+480% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 658 | 8,191+1145% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 1,454+708% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | 5,783+951% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 635 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Athlon II X4 635 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 770,785G,790FX,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X4 635) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 635 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 635 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($250 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $148 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 635 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 173.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $160-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $102-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 127.7+1319% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 635 and Core i5-10400F
