Athlon II X4 635 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Athlon II X4 635

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X4 635 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 635

4 / 4

2,248

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

+897.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 635 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 635 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 635

2010

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,248 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +369.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1113.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 635.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon II X4 635?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 369.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 897.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 369.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 897.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $71 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 369.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1113.1% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 635 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 635

The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 635 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon II X4 635 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 635 scores 2,248 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 163.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Athlon II X4 635	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4.4 GHz+52%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	2,248	22,430+898%
Cinebench R23 Multi	658	—
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	550	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 635 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Athlon II X4 635 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 635) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 770,785G,790FX,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X4 635) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Athlon II X4 635	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	AM3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066	DDR4-3200+140%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget.

Feature	Athlon II X4 635	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 635 was priced at $400, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($400 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 635 delivers 5.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 169.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X4 635	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$400	$329-18%
Performance per Dollar	5.6	68.2+1118%
Release Date	2010	2019

Search Athlon II X4 635 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.