Athlon MP 2400+ vs Sempron 2500+

AMD

Athlon MP 2400+

1 Cores1 Thrd60 WWMax: 2 GHz2002
VS
AMD

Sempron 2500+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2001

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Sempron 2500+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Sempron 2500+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Sempron 2500+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon MP 2400+

2002

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 60W instead of 62W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $151 MSRP, while Sempron 2500+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 2500+

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon MP 2400+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (277 vs 305).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon MP 2400+ better than Sempron 2500+?
    Yes. Athlon MP 2400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon MP 2400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon MP 2400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon MP 2400+ is the better buy right now. Athlon MP 2400+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $151 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon MP 2400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon MP 2400+ vs Sempron 2500+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon MP 2400+

    The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000βˆ’2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.

    AMD

    Sempron 2500+

    The Sempron 2500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001βˆ’2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $80.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon MP 2400+ and Sempron 2500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 1.75 GHz on the Sempron 2500+ β€” a 13.3% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2400+. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000βˆ’2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 2500+ uses Palermo (2001βˆ’2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Sempron 2500+'s 277 β€” a 9.6% lead for the Athlon MP 2400+.

    FeatureAthlon MP 2400+Sempron 2500+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz+14%
    1.75 GHz
    L3 Cache
    β€”
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    256 kB
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    K7 (2000βˆ’2004)
    Palermo (2001βˆ’2005)
    PassMark
    305+10%
    277