Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i7-9700K

AMD

Athlon PRO 300GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300GE

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $335 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,342 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +178.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Athlon PRO 300GE?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 231.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 178.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 231.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-9700K comes in 670.0% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon PRO 300GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. Giving up that much average FPS in the shared benchmark data is simply too much for that budget trade-off.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 300GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon PRO 300GE

The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 107.3% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
4,342
14,397+232%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i7-9700K
Socket
AM4
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon PRO 300GE was priced at $50, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($50 vs $385), Athlon PRO 300GE was $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 300GE delivers 86.8 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Athlon PRO 300GE the 79.6% better value option.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i7-9700K
MSRP
$50-87%
$385
Performance per Dollar
86.8+132%
37.4
Release Date
2019
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.