Athlon X2 340 vs Pentium 3550M

AMD

Athlon X2 340

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 3550M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Athlon X2 340 vs Pentium 3550M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 340 vs Pentium 3550M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 340 vs Pentium 3550M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 340

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Pentium 3550M.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $30 MSRP, while Pentium 3550M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3550M

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,327 vs 1,333).
    • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon X2 340 better than Pentium 3550M?
    Yes. Athlon X2 340 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 340 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon X2 340 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 340 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $30 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 3550M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon X2 340 vs Pentium 3550M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon X2 340

    The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Pentium 3550M

    The Pentium 3550M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $134.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon X2 340 and Pentium 3550M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium 3550M — a 44.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon X2 340 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 3550M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 340 scores 1,333 against the Pentium 3550M's 1,327 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X2 340.

    FeatureAthlon X2 340Pentium 3550M
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz+57%
    2.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.2 GHz+39%
    2.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (total)
    256K (per core)+25500%
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Trinity (2012−2013)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    1,333
    1,327
    Geekbench 6 Single
    397
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    549
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon X2 340 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3550M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon X2 340Pentium 3550M
    Socket
    FM2
    PGA946
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 340) / not specified (Pentium 3550M). Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop.

    FeatureAthlon X2 340Pentium 3550M
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Desktop