Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon L5335

Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 L310

2 / 2

1,747

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 L310

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 50W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 L310 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,737 vs 1,747).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌4900% higher power demand at 50W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 L310 better than Xeon L5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon X2 L310 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 L310 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 L310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 L310 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 L310 comes in $280 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 282.2% better value on MSRP (17.5 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 L310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 L310

The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 L310 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 50% clock advantage for the Xeon L5335. The Athlon X2 L310 uses the Conesus (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 L310 scores 1,747 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon X2 L310.

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2 GHz+67%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Conesus (2009)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,747	1,737
Geekbench 6 Single	120	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	213	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 L310 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Xeon L5335
Socket	S1	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Athlon X2 L310) / not specified (Xeon L5335). Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile.

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Xeon L5335
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X2 L310 was priced at $100, while the Xeon L5335 came in at $380. On launch pricing ($100 vs $380), Athlon X2 L310 was $280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 L310 delivers 17.5 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Xeon L5335 — making the Athlon X2 L310 the 117% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Xeon L5335
MSRP	$100-74%	$380
Performance per Dollar	17.5+280%	4.6
Release Date	2009	2007

Search Athlon X2 L310 on Amazon

Search Xeon L5335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.