Athlon XP 3100+ vs Pentium 4 2.80

AMD

Athlon XP 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.80

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.79 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3100+ vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3100+

2003

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $177 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
  • Delivers 127.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
  • Draws 68W instead of 110W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.80

2002

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 3100+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (408 vs 425).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.8 PassMark/$ ($327 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
    • 61.8% higher power demand at 110W vs 68W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon XP 3100+ better than Pentium 4 2.80?
    Yes. Athlon XP 3100+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 3100+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 3100+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon XP 3100+ is the better buy right now. Athlon XP 3100+ comes in $177 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $327 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 127.1% better value on MSRP (2.8 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon XP 3100+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon XP 3100+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 3100+

    The Athlon XP 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.80

    The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon XP 3100+ and Pentium 4 2.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3100+ versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 23.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3100+ scores 425 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 4.1% lead for the Athlon XP 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Pentium 4 2.80
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.79 GHz+27%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    512 kB+100%
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    425+4%
    408
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon XP 3100+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Pentium 4 2.80
    Socket
    A
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-333
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon XP 3100+ was priced at $150, while the Pentium 4 2.80 came in at $327. On launch pricing ($150 vs $327), Athlon XP 3100+ was $177 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3100+ delivers 2.8 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.80 — making the Athlon XP 3100+ the 77.7% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon XP 3100+Pentium 4 2.80
    MSRP
    $150-54%
    $327
    Performance per Dollar
    2.8+133%
    1.2
    Release Date
    2003
    2002

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.