Atom 330 vs Phenom II X4 P960

Atom 330 vs Phenom II X4 P960 Performance Spectrum

Atom 330

2 / 4

1,530

0.0%

1,542

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom 330 vs Phenom II X4 P960 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom 330 vs Phenom II X4 P960: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom 330

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X4 P960 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,530 vs 1,542).
❌Launch MSRP is still $43 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 P960 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 8W vs 2W.

Phenom II X4 P960

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 8W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 P960 better than Atom 330?

Yes. Phenom II X4 P960 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 P960 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 P960 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 P960 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Phenom II X4 P960 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $43 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom 330 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 P960 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom 330 vs Phenom II X4 P960 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom 330

The Atom 330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $43.

Phenom II X4 P960

The Phenom II X4 P960 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,542 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom 330 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 P960 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 P960 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Atom 330 versus 1.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 P960 — a 178.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 P960. The Atom 330 uses the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 P960 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom 330 scores 1,530 against the Phenom II X4 P960's 1,542 — a 0.8% lead for the Phenom II X4 P960.

Feature	Atom 330	Phenom II X4 P960
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	1.8 GHz+1700%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Diamondville (2008−2009)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,530	1,542

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom 330 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 P960 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.