
Atom 330

Phenom X4 9750B
Atom 330 vs Phenom X4 9750B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom 330 vs Phenom X4 9750B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom 330 vs Phenom X4 9750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom 330
2008Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $172 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 403.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($43 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 95W, a 87W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Phenom X4 9750B
2008Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,520 vs 1,530).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).
- ❌1087.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 8W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom 330 better than Phenom X4 9750B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom 330 vs Phenom X4 9750B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom 330
The Atom 330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $43.

Phenom X4 9750B
The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom 330 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Atom 330 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — a 184% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B. The Atom 330 uses the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom 330 scores 1,530 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom 330. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom 330 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B.
| Feature | Atom 330 | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+2300% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Diamondville (2008−2009) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,530 | 1,520 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom 330 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Atom 330 versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Phenom X4 9750B supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom X4 9750B supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom 330) vs 2 (Phenom X4 9750B). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom 330) vs 16 (Phenom X4 9750B) — the Phenom X4 9750B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA437 (Atom 330) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).
| Feature | Atom 330 | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PBGA437 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | DDR2-1066+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom 330) / AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). Primary use case: Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Atom 330 | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom 330 was priced at $43, while the Phenom X4 9750B came in at $215. On launch pricing ($43 vs $215), Atom 330 was $172 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom 330 delivers 35.6 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9750B — making the Atom 330 the 133.7% better value option.
| Feature | Atom 330 | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $43-80% | $215 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+401% | 7.1 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















