Atom C3338 vs Core i5-10400F

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3338 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3338 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3338

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +575.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom C3338.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Atom C3338 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Atom C3338?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 575.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1167.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 575.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1167.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 575.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom C3338 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3338

The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3338 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 170.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

Feature	Atom C3338	Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	4.3 GHz+95%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+93%
L3 Cache	4 MB	12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	1,028	13,029+1167%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,191
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,783

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom C3338) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 10 (Atom C3338) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

Feature	Atom C3338	Core i5-10400F
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3338) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.