Atom D2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Atom D2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Performance Spectrum

Atom D2500

2 / 2

605

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

+2.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2500

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3600, while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (605 vs 622).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ better than Atom D2500?

Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom D2500 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2500

The Atom D2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 605 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom D2500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2500 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — a 24.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Atom D2500 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Atom D2500 scores 605 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 2.8% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

Feature	Atom D2500	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.4 GHz+28%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark	605	622+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2500 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2500 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — the Atom D2500 supports 166.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D2500 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2500) vs 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) — the Atom D2500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2500) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+).

Feature	Atom D2500	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Socket	FCBGA559	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+167%	400
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2500) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+). The Atom D2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3600), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.