Atom D2500 vs Turion 64 ML-40

Atom D2500 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Performance Spectrum

Atom D2500

2 / 2

605

+0.8%

600

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2500 vs Turion 64 ML-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2500 vs Turion 64 ML-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2500

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3600, while Turion 64 ML-40 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Turion 64 ML-40

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (600 vs 605).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2500 better than Turion 64 ML-40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 ML-40 is ahead with 17.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2500 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2500 is the better buy right now. Atom D2500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion 64 ML-40 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 17.6% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2500 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2500

The Atom D2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 605 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-40

The Turion 64 ML-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-40 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom D2500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2500 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-40 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-40. The Atom D2500 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2500 scores 605 against the Turion 64 ML-40's 600 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom D2500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D2500	Turion 64 ML-40
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	605	600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2500 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.