CPU
GPU
Atom D2500
Opteron 250
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D2500 is positioned at rank 79 and the Opteron 250 is on rank 700, so the Atom D2500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom D2500
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 250
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom D2500 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom D2500 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom D2500 and Opteron 250
Atom D2500
The Atom D2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 605 points. Launch price was $69.
Opteron 250
The Opteron 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The Atom D2500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 250 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom D2500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2500 versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 250 — a 24.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 250. The Atom D2500 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 250 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2500 scores 605 against the Opteron 250's 620 — a 2.4% lead for the Opteron 250. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom D2500 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz | 2.4 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-75% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Cedarview (2011−2012) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 605 | 620+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D2500 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 250 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom D2500 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom D2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3600), while the Opteron 250 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom D2500 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3600 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom D2500 and Opteron 250
