Atom D2500
VS
Pentium D 830

Atom D2500 vs Pentium D 830

Intel

Atom D2500

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium D 830

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D2500 is positioned at rank 79 and the Pentium D 830 is on rank 1103, so the Atom D2500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D2500

#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
99%
#67
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
242%
#68
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
239%
#69
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
219%
#70
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
218%
#71
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
216%
#73
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
209%
#74
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
200%
#75
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
200%
#76
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
195%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
100%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 830

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
159038%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
150276%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
109112%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
32871%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
26037%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
22778%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
13046%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
12876%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
11723%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
11722%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
11591%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
11279%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
11121%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
11076%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
10976%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
100%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
98%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
95%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
93%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
91%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
86%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
81%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
75%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
74%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
71%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
64%
#1114
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
64%
#1115
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
64%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
63%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
62%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom D2500 (2011) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom D2500Pentium D 830
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium D 830 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom D2500Pentium D 830
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+115%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom D2500 and Pentium D 830

Intel

Atom D2500

The Atom D2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 605 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium D 830

The Pentium D 830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 618 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Atom D2500 and Pentium D 830 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2500 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium D 830 — a 46.4% clock advantage for the Pentium D 830 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Atom D2500 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium D 830 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2500 scores 605 against the Pentium D 830's 618 — a 2.1% lead for the Pentium D 830. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom D2500Pentium D 830
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz
3 GHz+60%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
3 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Cedarview (2011−2012)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
605
618+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
151
Geekbench 6 Multi
341
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2500 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D 830 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2500 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 830 — the Atom D2500 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2500) vs 2 (Pentium D 830). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2500) vs 16 (Pentium D 830) — the Pentium D 830 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2500) and 945,955,975 (Pentium D 830).

FeatureAtom D2500Pentium D 830
Socket
FCBGA559
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2500) / None (Pentium D 830). The Atom D2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3600), while the Pentium D 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium D 830 targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAtom D2500Pentium D 830
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3600
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Atom D2500 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Pentium D 830 debuted at $316.

FeatureAtom D2500Pentium D 830
MSRP
$42-87%
$316
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2011
2005