Atom D410 vs Celeron 2.30

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D410 vs Celeron 2.30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D410 vs Celeron 2.30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D410

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 73W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Celeron 2.30 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron 2.30

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D410 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (325 vs 345).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom D410 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌630% higher power demand at 73W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D410 better than Celeron 2.30?

Yes. Atom D410 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D410 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D410 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D410 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 2.30 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D410 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D410 vs Celeron 2.30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D410

The Atom D410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $636.

Celeron 2.30

The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D410 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron 2.30's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D410 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 31.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Atom D410 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D410 scores 345 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 6% lead for the Atom D410. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D410	Celeron 2.30
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	2.3 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+300%	128 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	345+6%	325

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D410 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2.30 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D410 versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 — the Atom D410 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D410) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).

Feature	Atom D410	Celeron 2.30
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+100%	DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D410) / No (Celeron 2.30). The Atom D410 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 2.30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.