Atom D425
VS
Athlon XP 2800+

Atom D425 vs Athlon XP 2800+

Intel

Atom D425

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd74 WWMax: 2.25 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D425 is positioned at rank 1088 and the Athlon XP 2800+ is on rank 1125, so the Atom D425 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D425

#1076
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3047%
#1077
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3002%
#1078
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2756%
#1079
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2744%
#1080
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2718%
#1082
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2625%
#1083
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2517%
#1084
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2513%
#1085
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2445%
#1088
Atom D425
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
308629%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
291624%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
211743%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
63789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
50528%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
44202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
25317%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
24986%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
22750%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
22749%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
22494%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
21887%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
21581%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
21494%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
21299%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
100%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
97%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
95%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
90%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
90%
#1130
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
90%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
88%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
87%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
83%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
82%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
80%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
73%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
69%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
68%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
62%
#1140
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom D425 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom D425Athlon XP 2800+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2800+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom D425Athlon XP 2800+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom D425 and Athlon XP 2800+

Intel

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

AMD

Athlon XP 2800+

The Athlon XP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 74 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom D425 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon XP 2800+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 versus 2.25 GHz on the Athlon XP 2800+ — a 20.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2800+. The Atom D425 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon XP 2800+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D425 scores 385 against the Athlon XP 2800+'s 380 — a 1.3% lead for the Atom D425. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom D425Athlon XP 2800+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
2.25 GHz+23%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Barton (2001−2004)
PassMark
385+1%
380
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D425 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2800+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom D425 versus DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2800+ — the Atom D425 supports -203.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D425 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom D425) and KT400,nForce2 Ultra 400 (Athlon XP 2800+).

FeatureAtom D425Athlon XP 2800+
Socket
FCBGA559
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D425) / None (Athlon XP 2800+). The Atom D425 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon XP 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon XP 2800+ targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAtom D425Athlon XP 2800+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop