Atom D425 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

Atom D425 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Atom D425

1 / 2

385

+2.4%

376

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D425 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D425 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D425

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 128W, a 118W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Mobile Sempron 3300+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (376 vs 385).
❌1180% higher power demand at 128W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D425 better than Mobile Sempron 3300+?

Yes. Atom D425 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D425 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D425 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D425 still makes the most sense overall. Atom D425 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D425 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D425 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Roma (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 745. Thermal design power (TDP): 128 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D425 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Mobile Sempron 3300+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron 3300+ — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron 3300+. The Atom D425 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses Roma (2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D425 scores 385 against the Mobile Sempron 3300+'s 376 — a 2.4% lead for the Atom D425.

Feature	Atom D425	Mobile Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+300%	128 kB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Roma (2005)
PassMark	385+2%	376

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D425 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses 745 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.