Atom D425 vs Atom N475

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D425 vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D425 vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D425

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (385 vs 405).

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅+5.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Atom D425 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N475 better than Atom D425?

Yes. Atom N475 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.2% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N475 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D425 vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom D425 and Atom N475 share an identical 1-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). Both are built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Atom D425 scores 385 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 5.1% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D425	Atom N475
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.83 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	385	405+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA559 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom D425 versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom D425 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D425 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom D425) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).

Feature	Atom D425	Atom N475
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800+20%	DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D425) and Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N475) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.