Atom D425 vs Core Solo T1350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D425 vs Core Solo T1350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D425 vs Core Solo T1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D425

2010

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Core Solo T1350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (385 vs 405).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Atom D425 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1350 better than Atom D425?

Yes. Core Solo T1350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1350 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1.6% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1350 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D425 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D425 vs Core Solo T1350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D425 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core Solo T1350's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 versus 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 — a 1.6% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Atom D425 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Solo T1350 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D425 scores 385 against the Core Solo T1350's 405 — a 5.1% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D425	Core Solo T1350
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	1.86 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.86 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	385	405+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D425 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1350 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.