Atom E3826
Ryzen 7 5700X
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom E3826
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 26,609).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1617.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Atom E3826 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3826 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Atom E3826?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Atom E3826
The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Atom E3826 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 103.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Atom E3826 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3826 scores 545 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 192% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3826 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 4.6 GHz+213% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 545 | 26,609+4782% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom E3826 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3826 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3826) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3826) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3826) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The Atom E3826 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom E3826 and Ryzen 7 5700X
