
Atom E3826

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom E3826
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 120W, a 113W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 34,293).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1170, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +2031.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1170 and older memory support.
- ✅600% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Atom E3826 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1614.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 7W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Atom E3826?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3826 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3826
The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Atom E3826 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 109.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. The Atom E3826 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3826 scores 545 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 193.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3826 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 5 GHz+240% |
| Base Clock | — | 4.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 5 nm-77% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 545 | 34,293+6192% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom E3826 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3826 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 387.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3826) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3826) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR5-5200+388% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 28+600% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3826) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom E3826) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Atom E3826 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













