Atom N2800 vs Celeron N4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N2800 vs Celeron N4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N2800 vs Celeron N4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N2800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Celeron N4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $47 MSRP, while Celeron N4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 7W vs 6W.

Celeron N4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 7W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,817 vs 1,829).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4500 better than Atom N2800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N4500 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4500 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N4500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $47 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N2800 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N2800 vs Celeron N4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N4500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N4500 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4500 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Celeron N4500's 1,817 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom N2800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N2800 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500.

Feature	Atom N2800	Celeron N4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.8 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz+69%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+34033%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	1,829	1,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4500 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom N2800	Celeron N4500
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—