
Atom N2800

Core 2 Duo T7100
Atom N2800 vs Core 2 Duo T7100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom N2800 vs Core 2 Duo T7100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom N2800 vs Core 2 Duo T7100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom N2800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($47 MSRP vs $197 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($47 MSRP vs $197 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Core 2 Duo T7100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌250% higher power demand at 7W vs 2W.
Core 2 Duo T7100
2007Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 7W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,817 vs 1,829).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($197 MSRP vs $47 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom N2800 better than Core 2 Duo T7100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N2800 vs Core 2 Duo T7100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Processing Power
The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7100's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Atom N2800 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Core 2 Duo T7100's 1,817 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom N2800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz+4% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz+3% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,829 | 1,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — the Atom N2800 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2800) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T7100). Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2800) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100).
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+60% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N2800) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100). The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom N2800 was priced at $47, while the Core 2 Duo T7100 came in at $197. On launch pricing ($47 vs $197), Atom N2800 was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N2800 delivers 38.9 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7100 — making the Atom N2800 the 123.4% better value option.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $47-76% | $197 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.9+323% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














