Atom N2800 vs Pentium G3250T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium G3250T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium G3250T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N2800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($47 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($47 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G3250T

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,818 vs 1,829).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $47 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N2800 better than Pentium G3250T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3250T is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N2800 is the better buy right now. Atom N2800 comes in $17 cheaper on MSRP at $47 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium G3250T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 37.0% better value on MSRP (38.9 vs 28.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3250T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium G3250T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

Pentium G3250T

The Pentium G3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,818 points. Launch price was $46.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G3250T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G3250T — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G3250T (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3250T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Pentium G3250T's 1,818 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom N2800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N2800 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3250T.

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium G3250T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.8 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2.8 GHz+51%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,829	1,818

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3250T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium G3250T
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Pentium G3250T requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium G3250T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel GMA 3650	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom N2800 was priced at $47, while the Pentium G3250T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($47 vs $64), Atom N2800 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N2800 delivers 38.9 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G3250T — making the Atom N2800 the 31.2% better value option.

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium G3250T
MSRP	$47-27%	$64
Performance per Dollar	38.9+37%	28.4
Release Date	2011	2014

Search Atom N2800 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3250T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.