Atom N470
VS
Athlon 64 2600+

Atom N470 vs Athlon 64 2600+

Intel

Atom N470

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N470 is positioned at rank 966 and the Athlon 64 2600+ is on rank 1080, so the Atom N470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N470

#954
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1905%
#955
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1877%
#956
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1723%
#957
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1716%
#958
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1700%
#960
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1642%
#961
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1574%
#962
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1571%
#963
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1529%
#966
Atom N470
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
99%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
99%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
98%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
79519%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
75138%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
54556%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16435%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
13019%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11389%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6523%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5862%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5861%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5796%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5639%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5560%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5538%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5488%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
91%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
91%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
90%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
89%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
87%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
85%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
84%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
84%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
84%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
83%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
82%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
79%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom N470 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 2600+ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom N470Athlon 64 2600+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom N470Athlon 64 2600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N470 and Athlon 64 2600+

Intel

Atom N470

The Atom N470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom N470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon 64 2600+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N470 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Atom N470. The Atom N470 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N470 scores 385 against the Athlon 64 2600+'s 392 — a 1.8% lead for the Athlon 64 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N470Athlon 64 2600+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz+14%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Lima (2008−2009)
PassMark
385
392+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N470 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N470) vs 2 (Athlon 64 2600+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N470) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+).

FeatureAtom N470Athlon 64 2600+
Socket
FCBGA559
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
16 GB+700%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N470 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2600+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N470Athlon 64 2600+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150