Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i3-4150T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i3-4150T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i3-4150T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8300

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 493.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 146.7 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($20 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4150T

2014

Why buy it

✅1500% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 1) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,892 vs 2,934).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 146.7 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-Z8300 better than Core i3-4150T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4150T is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-Z8300 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-Z8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-Z8300 is the better buy right now. Atom x5-Z8300 comes in $97 cheaper on MSRP at $20 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-4150T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 493.5% better value on MSRP (146.7 vs 24.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-Z8300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i3-4150T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8300

The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4150T

The Core i3-4150T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-Z8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4150T — a 44.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4150T (base: 1.44 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4150T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8300 scores 2,934 against the Core i3-4150T's 2,892 — a 1.4% lead for the Atom x5-Z8300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150T.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8300	Core i3-4150T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.84 GHz	2.9 GHz+58%
Base Clock	1.44 GHz	3 GHz+108%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,934+1%	2,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4150T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-RS 1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4150T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x5-Z8300) vs 2 (Core i3-4150T). PCIe lanes: 1 (Atom x5-Z8300) vs 16 (Core i3-4150T) — the Core i3-4150T offers 15 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8300	Core i3-4150T
Socket	UTFCBGA592	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	32 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	1	16+1500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-Z8300) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4150T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8300) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4150T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8300	Core i3-4150T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop Low Power

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x5-Z8300 was priced at $20, while the Core i3-4150T came in at $117. On launch pricing ($20 vs $117), Atom x5-Z8300 was $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x5-Z8300 delivers 146.7 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4150T — making the Atom x5-Z8300 the 142.3% better value option.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8300	Core i3-4150T
MSRP	$20-83%	$117
Performance per Dollar	146.7+494%	24.7
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Atom x5-Z8300 on Amazon

Search Core i3-4150T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.