Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon 5148

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 5148

2 Cores2 Thrd40 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon 5148 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon 5148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon 5148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8700

2015

Why buy it

  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Xeon 5148 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 5148

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,315 vs 1,325).
    • No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-Z8700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom x7-Z8700 better than Xeon 5148?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom x7-Z8700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-Z8700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom x7-Z8700 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7-Z8700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom x7-Z8700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon 5148 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom x7-Z8700

    The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Xeon 5148

    The Xeon 5148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $9.

    Processing Power

    The Atom x7-Z8700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon 5148 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5148 — a 3% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8700. The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 5148 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8700 scores 1,325 against the Xeon 5148's 1,315 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom x7-Z8700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Xeon 5148
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz+3%
    2.33 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB
    4 MB+100%
    Process
    14 nm-78%
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
    Woodcrest (2006)
    PassMark
    1,325
    1,315
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5148 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Xeon 5148
    Socket
    UTFCBGA1380
    LGA771
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    2
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Atom x7-Z8700 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Xeon 5148 requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Xeon 5148
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)