Atom x7211E vs Core i5-13600K
Atom x7211E
Core i5-13600K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7211E is positioned at rank #240 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211E
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x7211E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x7211E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211E and Core i5-13600K
Atom x7211E
The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 174.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 14 / 20+600% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+250% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 24 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,553 | 37,655+1375% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Core i5-13600K). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 20 (Core i5-13600K) — the Core i5-13600K offers 11 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 192 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 20+122% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7211E) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom x7211E and Core i5-13600K
